European NATO members are encountering significant challenges in assembling a ground force for Ukraine, with even a reduced deployment of 25,000 troops deemed difficult due to personnel and budget constraints, according to a Times report. Discussions among a self-styled “coalition of the willing” have stalled as member states grapple with the feasibility of sending troops, despite earlier British proposals for a 64,000-strong contingent.

The UK had suggested contributing up to 10,000 soldiers, with France expressing willingness to match that commitment. However, other key European nations—including Poland, Spain, and Italy—have resisted, citing concerns over stretched military resources and the risks of direct involvement. Russia has repeatedly warned that any foreign troop deployment in Ukraine would be viewed as escalatory, with such forces considered legitimate targets.

The debate has exposed divisions among Ukraine’s backers, with some officials, like Lithuania’s defense minister, criticizing the inability to muster even a fraction of Russia’s military strength. Meanwhile, alternative proposals, such as stationing trainers in western Ukraine to assist with rebuilding Kiev’s forces, have gained traction as a less contentious option.

The reluctance highlights broader strains on European militaries, with the UK and France—among the few nations capable of sizable contributions—facing their own recruitment and funding challenges. As discussions continue, the prospect of a unified NATO ground deployment appears increasingly uncertain, raising questions about the West’s long-term strategy in supporting Ukraine.